The same solution as in OpenCnC - applied to OpenRA?
Why this will not eliminated base walking, it will for sure make it more work intensive. As a side effective, exsessive artillery attacks under cover of base-walking and air defenses will not be as deadly as before.
Still I don't like this style, because as soon as you lose your conyard in one base and it is being attacked you cannot even place defense buildings there any more (assuming you still have another conyard somewhere).
It would require some familiarization to spread conyards across wide bases, but people like me don't like to change.
I am lobbying for solutions that make it impossible to build near enemy bases.
What about radio buttons in the game lobby to choose between several (i.e. even more than default and cnc style) modes?
i dont think we should get rid of "basewalking" , because even in "new" rts-games (cnc/ra) its still there , but not removed ... i did some research about cnc3 , and i see no problems to "basewalk" ... theres even 3 options to expand , deploy mcv , basewalk "and" the Surveyor that act as a outpost ...
i think the reason why there is no talk about "basewalking" in cnc3 is because :
- you "cant" build off ally conyards (there is not even a rule for that to change it)
- the powerplant is bit more expensive then a barrack ... (but you can build it faster)
i tryed 3-4 times a game with "build off ally conyard << off" ... and i hate it ... but thats because im too familiar with the current gameplay ... (on default)
set that thing as default , will make the game harder (even for the pros) ... but it would change things in the future ... specially about basewalking ...
NO : because it makes no sense for me ... basewalking (to expand forward to the next ore patch) is a essential element for me ... and its more important to work on the "basic problem"
i wanna play a game on default , without the basewalk problem (using it as attack) ...
and i tell you , it will give soviet some advantage , because actually it was possible to defend a "v2" by pp-turret , or even pp-pillbox forward to the v2 ... (mostly "after" the first pp gets down) ...
and in general , the soviets have the "rush units" ... that will make turn the "allies" into a turtle faction ... (im expecting it will turn into this) ...
basewalk has to be nerved not removed <----- that is , what we have to do
http://www.sleipnirstuff.com/forum/view ... 82&t=16272
Building husks with timeout like several seconds would be good. This measure and walls + nice maps may solve that issue nicely. People should basewalk from their allies even if theirs ally doesn't have conyard at all. A lot of tactics are related to it (buildings diversification, allies protection etc.).
i dont know winston , how do you do that in tiberian sun ? ... in tiberian wars ?ddd wrote: ↑How do you like to protect a team in big maps in case like 3 people attack your teammate?
these games have no "build in your enemys buildradius"
and obviously , thats the reason why they do not have "serious" basewalk problems...imo
so that was my first thought , there must be something wrong in Open"RA"s gameplay and a "mcv buildradius" or "husks" is a completly different way then in new rts- games
(i know there is different oppinions about "new cnc" games , specially since EA handeling it , but thats mostly about the Cnc -Genre changes ... )
On that note, I vote yes simply because ANYTHING is better then how it is currently.
Some players like basewalking, others don't. An option will be good because it will please everybody (those who want basewalking can have it and those who don't want it can be happy too).
And I voted YES also because I think it's a bit strange to be overpowered all the time by extended bases. To me, the map seems to be filled by ivy.
Somehow, it doesn't look like a natural way to win a battle. In another hand, it brings strategy in the game...
So I think an option will be interesting. Let's add an option for all mods
The question is not only whether one can stop a coordinated/sophisticated base walking attack, but also if it is this type of gameplay what defines the OpenRA gaming experience.PersianImmortal wrote: ↑Basewalking isn't hard to counter at all. I see no issue with it.
It is far from easy to defend against basewalking attacks that are well executed. The problem is not that basewalking allows for the massive use of defensive structures for offensive purposes, but also provides cover for long-range weapons like artillery or V2.
Also, I would like to remind you how much the engineer ninja whore tactic was considered as an exploit before the building capture was changed. It allowed the rapid building of production and defense building in the enemy base. Of course there was a way against it - but it was so effective that I used engineers even in the late game.