OpenRA

DraLUSAD wrote: ↑I dont like the Idea of "Planes" Re-Arming in the Air, they need to return back to Helipads

Agreed!But I really feel that the traditional return-arming seems the air force too expensive and too weak,as original C&C came into a tank-war.

chrisf wrote: ↑Captured tech ought to work in C&C. It doesn't work in RA.

Last time I played it does't work in C&C.I'll test it more to confirm.

riderr3 wrote: ↑agreed, NOD must own SSML

Can't wait to use it~

chrisf wrote: ↑Commando requires barracks + your side's superweapon building (temple or advanced comm center)

Commando surely requires them.The problem is Nod doesn't have commando for the reason of balance.I'm really desirous to using NOD's SSML.

AFAIK, the reason for captured tech not working as it did in the original is down to how tech-trees are currently implemented; it's not the structures themselves that determine which units can be built, but instead completely down to the player's chosen faction. In original version,we see if I'm NO...

http://maddox.xmission.com/keyboard4.jpg Do this. Now. Nod doesn't get the MLRS (they never did in campaigns), the SSML is being worked on, only GDI get the APC (which is now armed with an AA weapon), and commandos aren't in yet either for reasons of balance, or you're not building the correct pre-...

I'VE PLAYED C&C SINCE 1996 AND REALLY LOYAL TO THIS GAME.HERE ARE MY SUGGESTIONS: FIRST,WISH TO SEE THE NOD'S CLASSIC SSM(BIG ROCKET LAUNCHER),caz it's really so COOLLLL!!!! MAYBE ADDING THEM IS TRUELY A GOOD IDEA!!!!!HOPE ADD THEM SOON... A LITTLE PROBLEM I FOUND IS BUILDING A $1500 HELIPAD DOESN'T...