OpenRA

Iirc the game files are within the AppImage, so there is no installation folder created. Was that your question?

givepeasachance already edited his post and removed said remark (after explaining what he meant). I don't think there is anything else to do with said comment. On that note: I don't think there is anything else to do with this thread other than closing it. Sorry givepeasachance, the discussion is no...

FWIW, I just updated the map for release-20180307: https://resource.openra.net/maps/28396/

avalach21 wrote: ↑

Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:19 pm

(as long as it is running Windows)

Again shows the superiority of Windows. Linux and mac users will have to live with OpenRA forever.

givepeasachance wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:06 pm

Maybe theres an option to report registered persons for racist language or nicknames?

The latest playtest adds support for ingame authentication and 'registered players only' servers. We hope that will improve the situation.

STUKAFK wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 14, 2018 11:12 pm

New 'deathscreams' suck, bring back the old ones

You are probably experiencing a bug with voices there. (We fortunately fixed it for the next playtest: OpenRA/OpenRA#15417)
Thanks for the report anyway.

A rough overview can be found at OpenRA/OpenRA#4989.

Kind of weird the map isn't on the resource center, though.

Luftwaffe wrote: ↑

Mon Jul 30, 2018 4:13 am

[...] and Debug Menu removed or those cheats completely re-done to make it usable. Right now it is not really fun or usable.

The Debug Menu is meant for testing and developing (coding, mapping, modding), not for playing anyway.

Try adding "Interactable:" to "transformedunit1" and "transformedunit2" (like Mustapha suggested, probably a misunderstanding here).

EDIT: Cannon only on structures and vehicles works, but at inf it still shoots with both. Hm. I'm using ValidTargets and InvalidTargets.. the latter doesn't seem to work? Do you mind sharing your yaml here as well? Maybe those examples are helpful: The 120mm cannons of mammoth tanks don't shoot inf...

"Vehicles: vehicles.yaml" won't work, the game doesn't expect a "Vehicles" category. Try putting those changes in the "Rules" section,
i.e. "Rules: vehicles.yaml" (in case you haven't defined other rules yet).

I removed comments derailing the topic and replies to it (which wouldn't make sense alone). Please keep the discussion civil and on-topic.

Removing the hijacker now does not ban the unit's assets forever from the game. If this motivates people to work on new concepts (there are already some nice new ideas in this thread) and the necessary code to reintroduce the unit (or fix the broken behaviour), then it's totally worth it IMO. Sorry...

eskimo wrote: ↑

Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:28 am

However, i don't personally care for any of that but thought i'd highlight it. Really i just dislike the idea of removing a unit (hijacker), that has proven to offer entertaining games and isn't a game breaking bug.

Agreed.