Lets discuss Shock Troopers (Red Alert)

A discussion of thoughts and feelings about shock trooper

Discussion about the game and its default mods.

Do you think shock troopers should be nerfed?

Yes
23
66%
No
12
34%
 
Total votes: 35

User avatar
Graion Dilach
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 5:57 pm

Post by Graion Dilach »

hotze wrote: You have to infiltrate an enemy's or teammate's production facilities.
Then you can build veteran units.
What? No... you can't infiltrate your teammate's facilities.
Image
Image
Image
AS Discord server: https://discord.gg/7aM7Hm2

User avatar
Murto the Ray
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 4:34 pm

Post by Murto the Ray »

You can by ctrl+right clicking your teammate's buildings

User avatar
JOo
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 8:12 pm

Post by JOo »

this is allready fixed

and so far , what im aware of is ... that you can rank them only 1 level up ... so you cant get a "star" unit ...

and 1 rank isnt much of a difference ... so it won't effect the gameplay in terms of balance

User avatar
r34ch
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:02 pm

Post by r34ch »

JOo wrote: and 1 rank isnt much of a difference ... so it won't effect the gameplay in terms of balance
I think its a great feature, but I wouldn't say giving various stat multipliers to an entire force of units won't affect gameplay in terms of balance - quite the opposite. Not to mention allied troops will level up faster too.

User avatar
raymundo
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:39 am

Post by raymundo »

I think this is an interesting feature, and for the soviet players simply build dogs and you have won't have to worry about a spy entering your buildings. For allied players iirc, you can actually use a spy to detect other spies. So if it is a 1v1 and you are allied you won't have access to dogs, but in 1v1 spies are much easier to detect anyway. If a soviet player takes 2 minutes to fill the bases up with dogs set on defend it will go a long way in helping protect everyone from spies.

It seems there is a consensus that shocks are too strong as they are; reducing shocks hp seems fair since their increased attack range is a feature the devs wanted to implement into the game.

abcdefg30
Posts: 643
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:00 pm

Post by abcdefg30 »

So, is everyone fine with the first set of changes done in OpenRA/OpenRA#9085?
Hijacker;
-cost increased from $500 to $600
-speed increased to 71
-stealthed when not moving

Shock trooper;
-cost increased from $400 to $500
-health reduced to 80 from 100

Heavy tank
-cost reduced from $1150 to $1050
-health increased from 550 to 575

Yak
-chaingun spread increased from 128 to 298

User avatar
raymundo
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:39 am

Post by raymundo »

abcdefg30 wrote: So, is everyone fine with the first set of changes done in OpenRA/OpenRA#9085?
Hijacker;
-cost increased from $500 to $600
-speed increased to 71
-stealthed when not moving

Shock trooper;
-cost increased from $400 to $500
-health reduced to 80 from 100

Heavy tank
-cost reduced from $1150 to $1050
-health increased from 550 to 575

Yak
-chaingun spread increased from 128 to 298
I think price increase for shocks is a bit much, maybe 450$ is better? ...my .02

noobmapmaker
Posts: 1086
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 11:59 am

Post by noobmapmaker »

Was wondering about the spread. Does it spread the same amount of damage across a larger area, or does a larger area get the current damage done?

If the latter is true then the yaks do get a big buff, the spread increase is ~130% (128 to 298)

Example: say, a yak has a potential of doing 1000hp damage tot a 2x2 area. That is 4 squares, which is 250hp per square. If it becomes 4x4 spread. Will it then still be 250 damage/square (= 250*16 = 4000hp)? Or does each square get 1000/16 = ~60hp damage per square?
Playlist with ALL games of the Dark Tournament Youtube.com/CorrodeCasts
Consider supporting OpenRA by setting a bounty or by donating for a server

User avatar
raymundo
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:39 am

Post by raymundo »

Along with those changes consider some things Allies side: Longbow fire rate, and cost of light tanks.

User avatar
Graion Dilach
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 5:57 pm

Post by Graion Dilach »

noobmapmaker wrote: Was wondering about the spread. Does it spread the same amount of damage across a larger area, or does a larger area get the current damage done?
The latter.
noobmapmaker wrote: If the latter is true then the yaks do get a big buff, the spread increase is ~130% (128 to 298)
Yes, but that's still small. A spread radius of 128 is 1/8th of a cell - a cell is 1024 unit wide. This means that ca. 1/3 cell around the epicenter will receive full damage alone.
Image
Image
Image
AS Discord server: https://discord.gg/7aM7Hm2

zinc
Posts: 657
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 3:46 pm

Post by zinc »

zinc wrote:
r34ch wrote:
zinc wrote: I don't think the health thing will change things when you get overrun by shockies.
I think the hp nerf is needed. 100hp is way too much. Currently they can survive 2 bursts from a hind. With 80hp they can only survive the one.

If they are still OP I would like to see their health reduced further down to 60, which is still higher than most of the infantry in the game. At 80hp they can survive a hit from a pillbox, at 60hp the pillbox kills them in one burst.
OK yeah maybe it will help.
I had no idea they had more health than other troops in the first place. Put it down to 60 imo or whatever is normal for troops.

User avatar
r34ch
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:02 pm

Post by r34ch »

noobmapmaker wrote: If the latter is true then the yaks do get a big buff, the spread increase is ~130% (128 to 298)
This is correct. On the latest release group 5 infantry in a cell and attack the center infantry. Almost no damage is inflicted to the rest of the infantry in that cell. With this change a burst will take out ~3 infantry in a cell and leave the rest on very low health. Infantry in adjacent cells take minor damage.

In MP infantry aren't usually bunched 5 in a cell but a good player will simply use 'scatter' which efficiently counters this change might I add.
raymundo wrote: Along with those changes consider some things Allies side: Longbow fire rate, and cost of light tanks.
Totally agree, but next PR.

Ideally I would like to submit incremental changes for testing in playtests to get feedback, much like AoAGeneral1 has been doing with the TD changes. I think I just got the timing of this PR off (just before a release)

noobmapmaker
Posts: 1086
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 11:59 am

Post by noobmapmaker »

ok, cool, thanks! Good change imo
Playlist with ALL games of the Dark Tournament Youtube.com/CorrodeCasts
Consider supporting OpenRA by setting a bounty or by donating for a server

User avatar
raymundo
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:39 am

Post by raymundo »

So nothing is going to change for upcoming release?

User avatar
r34ch
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:02 pm

Post by r34ch »

raymundo wrote: So nothing is going to change for upcoming release?
I just closed the PR following feedback to make changes.

I will change this first PR to balance the two most unbalanced factions; Russia and Germany.

Shockie
  • 100hp -> 60hp (now dies from parabombs and a pillbox burst)
  • $400 -> $500
Adv Chronosphere
  • 2m -> 3m charge time
These will be the only two changes in the first PR. I would like some of the veteran players to give input here as well as have the changes go through playtests before a release.


The second PR I was planning to buff some of the faction specific underused / gimmicky units (phase tank alpha dmg, demo truck speed, fake structures damage) etc

And the final PR would be to buff the general underused units (light tank, longbow, hijacker) etc

Post Reply